Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Credibility | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Expertise | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Knowledge Level | 1 |
| Medical Education | 1 |
| Medical Students | 1 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Measurement:… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMargolis, Melissa J.; Mee, Janet; Clauser, Brian E.; Winward, Marcia; Clauser, Jerome C. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2016
Evidence to support the credibility of standard setting procedures is a critical part of the validity argument for decisions made based on tests that are used for classification. One area in which there has been limited empirical study is the impact of standard setting judge selection on the resulting cut score. One important issue related to…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Credibility
