Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 3 |
| Construct Validity | 3 |
| Investigations | 2 |
| Cloze Procedure | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Equated Scores | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Intermode Differences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Ari, Omer | 1 |
| Koskey, Kristin L. K. | 1 |
| Peter F. Halpin | 1 |
| Santamaria, Carmen Nicole | 1 |
| Sondergeld, Toni A. | 1 |
| Stone, Gregory Ethan | 1 |
| Williams, Rihana Shiri | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peter F. Halpin – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2024
Background: Meta-analyses of educational interventions have consistently documented the importance of methodological factors related to the choice of outcome measures. In particular, when interventions are evaluated using measures developed by researchers involved with the intervention or its evaluation, the effect sizes tend to be larger than…
Descriptors: College Students, College Faculty, STEM Education, Item Response Theory
Williams, Rihana Shiri; Ari, Omer; Santamaria, Carmen Nicole – Journal of Research in Reading, 2011
Recent investigations challenge the construct validity of sustained silent reading tests. Performance of two groups of post-secondary students (e.g. struggling and non-struggling) on a sustained silent reading test and two types of cloze test (i.e. maze and open-ended) was compared in order to identify the test format that contributes greater…
Descriptors: Evidence, Cloze Procedure, Reading Comprehension, Investigations
Stone, Gregory Ethan; Koskey, Kristin L. K.; Sondergeld, Toni A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2011
Typical validation studies on standard setting models, most notably the Angoff and modified Angoff models, have ignored construct development, a critical aspect associated with all conceptualizations of measurement processes. Stone compared the Angoff and objective standard setting (OSS) models and found that Angoff failed to define a legitimate…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Models, Construct Validity

Peer reviewed
Direct link
