Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Functional Behavioral… | 2 |
| Behavior Problems | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Graphs | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Negative Reinforcement | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Behavior Modification | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| North Dakota | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWeatherly, Jeffrey N.; Miller, Joseph C.; Terrell, Heather K. – Behavior Modification, 2011
An attempt was made to modify the Gambling Functional Assessment (GFA), which was proposed to identify four possible contingencies maintaining the respondent's gambling behavior. However, previous research found that it only identified two contingencies (i.e., positive vs. negative reinforcement), with some items cross-loading on both…
Descriptors: Evidence, Undergraduate Students, Structural Equation Models, Construct Validity
Danov, Stacy E.; Symons, Frank J. – Behavior Modification, 2008
Visual inspection is the primary method used to analyze graphed behavioral data produced by functional analyses of problem behavior. The purpose of this study was to examine rater reliability of functional analysis graphs using visual inspection. Forty-three participants responded to a one-time anonymous survey (N = 454) mailed to graduate…
Descriptors: Graphs, Visual Discrimination, Behavior Problems, Functional Behavioral Assessment
