Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 1 |
| Journal of Special Education | 1 |
| Learning Disability Quarterly | 1 |
| National Center for Research… | 1 |
| Online Submission | 1 |
| Partnership for Assessment of… | 1 |
Author
| Abedi, Jamal | 1 |
| Anderson, Daniel | 1 |
| Bercovitz, Elizabeth | 1 |
| Brandt, Rusty | 1 |
| Custer, Michael | 1 |
| Emick, Jessica | 1 |
| Farley, Dan | 1 |
| Kao, Jenny C. | 1 |
| Kopriva, Rebecca J. | 1 |
| Leon, Seth | 1 |
| Nese, Joseph F. T. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 3 | 6 |
| Elementary Education | 3 |
| Early Childhood Education | 2 |
| Primary Education | 2 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 9 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Location
| Maryland | 1 |
| Maryland (Baltimore) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSaven, Jessica L.; Anderson, Daniel; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Farley, Dan; Tindal, Gerald – Journal of Special Education, 2016
Students with significant cognitive disabilities are eligible to participate in two statewide testing options for accountability: alternate assessments or general assessments with appropriate accommodations. Participation guidelines are generally quite vague, leading to students "switching" test participation between years. In this…
Descriptors: Intellectual Disability, Student Participation, State Surveys, Alternative Assessment
Powell, Sarah R. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2012
Students with disabilities are frequently granted accommodations for high-stakes standardized tests to provide them an opportunity to demonstrate their academic knowledge without interference from their disability. One type of possible accommodation, test response format, concerns whether students respond in multiple-choice or constructed-response…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Standardized Tests, Problem Solving, Mathematics Achievement
Download full textBrandt, Rusty; Bercovitz, Elizabeth; Zimmerman, Linda – Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, 2015
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) commissioned a multi-part study to determine the viability of using the drawing response interaction on the PARCC Mathematics Assessment. This study in particular focused on students with disabilities. PARCC has over 40 interaction types on the summative assessments. Why…
Descriptors: Usability, Freehand Drawing, Computer Software, Computer Assisted Testing
Abedi, Jamal; Leon, Seth; Kao, Jenny C. – National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), 2008
This study examines performance differences between students with disabilities and students without disabilities students using differential item functioning (DIF) analyses in a high-stakes reading assessment. Results indicated that for Grade 9, many items exhibited DIF. Items that exhibited DIF were more likely to be located in the second half…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Test Items, Student Evaluation, Disabilities
Kopriva, Rebecca J.; Wiley, David E.; Emick, Jessica – Online Submission, 2007
The goal of the current study was to examine the influence of providing more optimal testing conditions and evaluate the effect this has on the validity of the score inferences across ELL students with different needs, strengths, and levels of language proficiency. It was expected that the validity of the score inferences would be similar for 3rd…
Descriptors: Grade 5, Test Format, Inferences, Test Validity
Pomplun, Mark; Custer, Michael – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2005
This study investigated the equivalence of scores from computerized and paper-and-pencil formats of a series of K-3 reading screening tests. Concerns about score equivalence on the computerized formats were warranted because of the use of reading passages, computer unfamiliarity of primary school students, and teacher versus computer…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Reading Tests, Family Income, Factor Analysis
