Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Grade 2 | 2 |
| Learning Processes | 2 |
| Prompting | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Alternative Assessment | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 2 | 2 |
| Primary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Raven Progressive Matrices | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkTouw, Kirsten W. J.; Vogelaar, Bart; Bakker, Merel; Resing, Wilma C. M. – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2019
This study aimed to combine the use of electronic technology and dynamic testing to overcome the limitations of conventional static testing, and adapt more closely to children's individual needs. We investigated the effects of a newly developed computerized series completion test using a dynamic testing approach and its relation to school…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Academic Achievement, Elementary School Students, Grade 2
Touw, Kirsten W. J.; Vogelaar, Bart; Thissen, Floor; Resing, Wilma C. M. – Educational & Child Psychology, 2019
Background: Outcomes of static tests provide an indication of what children have learned in the past, up to the moment of testing, and can therefore underestimate the cognitive abilities of atypically developing children, such as children with language difficulties. In contrast, dynamic tests aim to examine children's potential for learning. The…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Prompting, Language Impairments, Language Skills
