NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Assessments and Surveys
Measures of Academic Progress1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Sydney Renee' Butler – ProQuest LLC, 2024
The problem addressed through this study was the potential effects of the lack of parent participation at individualized education plan (IEP) meetings on students' achievement. The research question in this study examined the relationship between parents of high school students with disabilities (SWD) attendance at annual IEP meetings and…
Descriptors: Parent Participation, Individualized Education Programs, Cooperative Planning, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Samuels, William Ellery; Tournaki, Nelly; Sacks, Stanley; Sacks, JoAnn; Blackman, Sheldon; Byalin, Kenneth; Zilinski, Christopher – European Educational Researcher, 2019
Executive functions (EFs) show promise as important mediators of adolescent academic performance. However, the expense of measuring EFs accurately has restricted most field-based research on them to smaller, non-longitudinal studies of homogeneous populations with specific diagnoses. We therefore monitored the development of 259 diverse, at-risk…
Descriptors: Grade Point Average, Predictor Variables, Executive Function, Adolescents
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rabren, Karen; Johnson, Cinda – Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 2010
There is a growing emphasis on academic performance and educational outcomes for students with disabilities. This focus is demonstrated, in part, by the federal requirement to collect post-school outcome data from these former students (i.e., Indicator 14). The purpose of this paper is to introduce two states' approaches to collecting post-school…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Education, Data Collection, Academic Achievement, Disabilities
Albus, Deb; Lazarus, Sheryl S.; Thurlow, Martha L.; Cormier, Damien – National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota, 2009
In April 2007, Federal No Child Left Behind regulations were finalized that provided states with additional flexibility for assessing some students with disabilities. The regulations allowed states to offer another assessment option, alternate assessments based on modified academic achievement standards (AA-MAS). States are not required to have…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Objectives, Outcomes of Education, Academic Achievement