Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Grade 10 | 2 |
| Grade 11 | 2 |
| Grade 4 | 2 |
| Grade 8 | 2 |
| High Schools | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Location
| Kansas | 2 |
| California | 1 |
| Connecticut | 1 |
| Louisiana | 1 |
| Maryland | 1 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
| North Dakota | 1 |
| Oklahoma | 1 |
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textAlbus, Deb; Lazarus, Sheryl S.; Thurlow, Martha L.; Cormier, Damien – National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota, 2009
In April 2007, Federal No Child Left Behind regulations were finalized that provided states with additional flexibility for assessing some students with disabilities. The regulations allowed states to offer another assessment option, alternate assessments based on modified academic achievement standards (AA-MAS). States are not required to have…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Objectives, Outcomes of Education, Academic Achievement
Center on Education Policy, 2009
This year the Center on Education Policy analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Low Income, American Indians, African American Students
