Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 6 |
Descriptor
| Research and Development | 6 |
| Researchers | 6 |
| Foreign Countries | 4 |
| Theory Practice Relationship | 3 |
| College Faculty | 2 |
| Cooperation | 2 |
| Epistemology | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Norms | 2 |
| Participant Characteristics | 2 |
| Scholarship | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Arts and Humanities in Higher… | 1 |
| Evidence & Policy: A Journal… | 1 |
| Higher Education Quarterly | 1 |
| Innovative Higher Education | 1 |
| International Journal of… | 1 |
| Minerva: A Review of Science,… | 1 |
Author
| Alice Civera | 1 |
| An-Sofie Smetcoren | 1 |
| Barbara Grant | 1 |
| Cathryn B. Bennett | 1 |
| Christopher C. Blyth | 1 |
| Daan Duppen | 1 |
| Darren Westphal | 1 |
| Delma Ramos | 1 |
| Destiny Z. Talley | 1 |
| Elsa Camargo | 1 |
| Erik Lehmann | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hatice Nuriler; Søren S. E. Bengtsen; Barbara Grant – Arts and Humanities in Higher Education: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 2025
This article explores societal impact of humanities doctoral research. Through an empirical inquiry based in Denmark, we analyse how current doctoral researchers conceptualize societal impact and how they articulate potential contributions to society. For theoretical framing, we employ a double-winged perspective combining concepts from the work…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Humanities, Doctoral Students, Researchers
Valeria Aman; Jochen Gläser – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2025
In their everyday work, scholars constantly acquire and transfer knowledge. Many of these knowledge flows are difficult to observe, not least because scholars are often not aware of them. This may be the reason why the attention to knowledge flows is very unevenly distributed across science studies, with bibliometric citation-based studies…
Descriptors: Sciences, Scholarship, Communication (Thought Transfer), Sharing Behavior
Elsa Camargo; Delma Ramos; Cathryn B. Bennett; Destiny Z. Talley; Ricardo G. Silva Jr. – Innovative Higher Education, 2025
Academic research and knowledge production are frequently pervaded by elitism (Torres-Olave et al., 2019), epistemic exclusion (Dotson, 2014; Settles et al., 2020), and racialization (Ray, 2019; Thelin, 2019; Wilder, 2013). These discriminatory, exclusionary, and biased systems delegitimize the work of minoritized scholars, stifle innovation, and…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Humanization, Norms, College Faculty
Katie Attwell; Tauel Harper; Samantha J. Carlson; Jordan Tchilingirian; Darren Westphal; Christopher C. Blyth – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2025
Background: Our interdisciplinary team initiated a project to inform the COVID-19 vaccination programme. We developed a novel research co-creation approach to share emerging findings with government. Aims and objectives: We critically assess the 'Functional Dialogue' (FD) programme for future research translation practices in time-limited…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, COVID-19, Immunization Programs, Technology Transfer
Alice Civera; Erik Lehmann; Michele Meoli; Stefano Paleari; Maria Sole Brioschi – Higher Education Quarterly, 2025
When a pronounced taste for science leads researchers to self-select themselves in academia, higher education systems must be able to protect it. By relying on the economic theory of higher education, the international mobility and the sociology of science literature, we compare the working condition in the four major European higher education…
Descriptors: Work Environment, Sciences, Higher Education, Foreign Countries
Octavia Kint; Daan Duppen; Geert Vandermeersche; An-Sofie Smetcoren; Liesbeth De Donder – International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2025
This paper aims to gain a better understanding of co-creative research key principles and their enactment in real-life practices. The study is based on interviews and a focus group with academic researchers and professionals (n = 16) involved in eight co-creative research projects funded by the Brussels Regional Institute for Research and…
Descriptors: Researchers, Professional Personnel, Participatory Research, Institutes (Training Programs)

Peer reviewed
Direct link
