Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
Descriptor
| Bias | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Course Evaluation | 1 |
| Data Interpretation | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Questionnaires | 1 |
| Standard Setting | 1 |
| Student Attitudes | 1 |
| Student Evaluation of Teacher… | 1 |
| Universities | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessment Update | 1 |
Author
| Arthur H. Goldsmith | 1 |
| Dan R. Johnson | 1 |
| Julie A. Woodzicka | 1 |
| Karla Klein Murdock | 1 |
| Lisa Greer | 1 |
| Toni Locy | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkJulie A. Woodzicka; Karla Klein Murdock; Lisa Greer; Dan R. Johnson; Toni Locy; Arthur H. Goldsmith – Assessment Update, 2025
Much has been written about bias in student evaluations of teaching (SETs), and efforts have been made to develop evaluation forms that minimize the risk of bias in students' responses. The authors created a fully qualitative open-ended SET instrument, along with a standard process to summarize and interpret results for use by all undergraduate…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Student Attitudes, Bias, Universities
