NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hansika Kapoor; Sarah Rezaei; Hreem Mahadeshwar; James C. Kaufman – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
Anxiety-driven counterfactual thinking can be a slippery slope. Building on the premise that both positive and negative emotions can impact creativity, the present study examines how trait anxiety, optimism, and other mental health factors like therapy experience shape outputs in divergent thinking (DT) tasks. Using an online sample (N = 647), the…
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Anxiety, Concept Formation, Task Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shari Cavicchi; Abdulaziz Abubshait; Giulia Siri; Magda Mustile; Francesca Ciardo – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2025
Cognitive load occurs when the demands of a task surpass the available processing capacity, straining mental resources and potentially impairing performance efficiency, such as increasing the number of errors in a task. Owing to its ubiquity in real-world scenarios, the existence of offloading strategies to reduce cognitive load is not new to…
Descriptors: Robotics, Psychological Patterns, Cognitive Processes, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rachael T. S. Cheang; Maya Skjevling; Alexandra I. F. Blakemore; Veena Kumari; Ignazio Puzzo – Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 2025
Empathy deficits in autism, particularly cognitive empathy, have been a long-held, but much debated assumption. An alternative perspective challenging this deficit model is the 'double empathy problem', proposing that empathy difficulties are bidirectional between autistic and non-autistic people. Despite this view gaining popularity, there has…
Descriptors: Autism Spectrum Disorders, Empathy, Accuracy, Task Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jussi Järvinen; Lauri Hietajärvi; Elina E. Ketonen; Katariina Salmela-Aro – Educational Psychology, 2025
This study examines how task instruction and task appraisals predict engagement and disaffection in classroom moments. We assessed 2,560 momentary survey responses from 124 Finnish 7th grade students using a within-person analytical approach. The results showed that students were more engaged during active instruction and when they had choice in…
Descriptors: Task Analysis, Learner Engagement, Instruction, Middle School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jiarui Hou; James F. Lee; Stephen Doherty – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Recent research has demonstrated the potential of mobile-assisted learning to enhance learners' learning outcomes. In contrast, the learning processes in this regard are much less explored using eye tracking technology. Objective: This systematic review study aims to synthesise the relevant work to reflect the current state of eye…
Descriptors: State of the Art Reviews, Eye Movements, Electronic Learning, Handheld Devices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tiegan Blackhurst; Lara Warmelink; Amanda Roestorf; Calum Hartley – Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 2025
Deception is a multi-faceted social behaviour that is pervasive in human communication. Due to differences in social communication and experiences, autistic and non-autistic adults may contrast in how they respond to situations that elicit deceptive decision-making. This study examined whether autistic and non-autistic adults differed in their…
Descriptors: Deception, Decision Making, Autism Spectrum Disorders, Task Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Julia Brooks; D. Catherine Walker; Kristen Murray – Journal of American College Health, 2025
Objective: Focusing on body functionality -- what the body can do -- may benefit women's body image. This pilot study examined the effects of focusing on body functionality appreciation during an audio-guided mirror gazing task (F-MGT). Participants: 101 college women, M(SD)[subscript AGE] = 19.49(1.31), were alternately assigned to F-MGT or a…
Descriptors: Human Body, Self Concept, Pilot Projects, Females