NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20256
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
ACT Assessment1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Beifang Ma; Maximilian Krötz; Viola Deutscher; Esther Winther – International Journal of Training and Development, 2025
The rapid digital transformation of vocational education and training (VET) has underscored the need to adapt traditional assessment methods to digital formats. However, when transitioning to digital modes, it is crucial to consider factors beyond mere technical implementation, particularly the potential impact of altered presentation formats on…
Descriptors: Job Skills, Competence, Test Format, Computer Assisted Testing
Jeff Allen; Jay Thomas; Stacy Dreyer; Scott Johanningmeier; Dana Murano; Ty Cruce; Xin Li; Edgar Sanchez – ACT Education Corp., 2025
This report describes the process of developing and validating the enhanced ACT. The report describes the changes made to the test content and the processes by which these design decisions were implemented. The authors describe how they shared the overall scope of the enhancements, including the initial blueprints, with external expert panels,…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Testing, Change, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
James Pengelley; Peter R. Whipp; Anabela Malpique – Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 2025
The rising use of technology in classrooms has also brought with it a concomitant wave of computer-based assessments. The argument for computer-based testing is often framed in terms of efficiency and data management: computer-based tests facilitate more efficient processing of test data and the rate at which feedback can be leveraged for student…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Paper and Pencil Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haoxin Xu; Tianrun Deng; Xianlong Xu; Xiaoqing Gu; Lingyun Huang; Haoran Xie; Minhong Wang – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
In the 21st century, the urgent educational demand for cultivating complex skills in vocational training and learning is met with the effectiveness of the four-component instructional design model. Despite its success, research has identified a notable gap in the address of formative assessment, particularly within computer-supported frameworks.…
Descriptors: Models, Instructional Design, Computer Assisted Testing, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bernis Sütçübasi; Tugçe Balli; Herbert Roeyers; Jan R. Wiersema; Sami Çamkerten; Ozan Cem Öztürk; Baris Metin; Edmund Sonuga-Barke – Journal of Attention Disorders, 2025
Objective: ADHD and autism are complex and frequently co-occurring neurodevelopmental conditions with shared etiological and pathophysiological elements. In this paper, we attempt to differentiate these conditions among the young people in terms of intrinsic patterns of brain connectivity revealed during resting state using machine learning…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Secondary School Students, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Héctor Raúl Ponce; Richard E. Mayer; Jirarat Sitthiworachart; Mario José López; Ester E. Méndez – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2025
This study examines the impact of incorporating cloze tests during pauses in classroom instruction as retrieval practice activities, using Audience Response Systems (ARS) for delivery. While ARSs traditionally rely on multiple-choice questions, cloze tests offer a potentially efficient alternative that aligns with retrieval practice principles.…
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Audience Response Systems, Recall (Psychology), Elementary School Students