Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 3 |
Descriptor
| Classification | 3 |
| Interrater Reliability | 3 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Cognitive Structures | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Concept Mapping | 1 |
| Engineering Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Alexandra Jackson | 1 |
| Cheryl Bodnar | 1 |
| Elise Barrella | 1 |
| Gabriel Mott | 1 |
| John Curiel | 1 |
| Juan Cruz | 1 |
| Koen Suzelis | 1 |
| Krista Kecskemety | 1 |
| Stefanie A. Wind | 1 |
| Yangmeng Xu | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkYangmeng Xu; Stefanie A. Wind – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2025
Double-scoring constructed-response items is a common but costly practice in mixed-format assessments. This study explored the impacts of Targeted Double-Scoring (TDS) and random double-scoring procedures on the quality of psychometric outcomes, including student achievement estimates, person fit, and student classifications under various…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Psychometrics, Scoring, Evaluation Methods
Alexandra Jackson; Cheryl Bodnar; Elise Barrella; Juan Cruz; Krista Kecskemety – Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 2025
Recent curricular interventions in engineering education have focused on encouraging students to develop an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) to equip them with the skills needed to generate innovative ideas and address complex global problems upon entering the workforce. Methods to evaluate these interventions have been inconsistent due to the lack of…
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Entrepreneurship, Concept Mapping, Student Evaluation
Koen Suzelis; Gabriel Mott; John Curiel – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2025
Student evaluations of teaching (SET) act as the primary means to gauge instructor effectiveness. Likewise, SETs provide the primary qualitative feedback to instructors via student comments. However, mostly students with strong feelings tend to write comments. Among the most recallable are toxic comments: comments that are unhelpful/hurtful in…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Automation, Identification, Student Attitudes
