Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Predictive Validity | 1 |
| Protocol Analysis | 1 |
| Reading Comprehension | 1 |
| Reading Tests | 1 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 1 |
| Test Validity | 1 |
| Vocabulary | 1 |
Source
| Journal of Psycholinguistic… | 1 |
Author
| Amanda Dahl | 1 |
| Ben Seipel | 1 |
| Heather Ness-Maddox | 1 |
| Mark L. Davison | 1 |
| Sarah E. Carlson | 1 |
| Terrill Taylor | 1 |
| Virginia Clinton-Lisell | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Nelson Denny Reading Tests | 1 |
| Test of Word Reading… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSarah E. Carlson; Virginia Clinton-Lisell; Terrill Taylor; Heather Ness-Maddox; Amanda Dahl; Mark L. Davison; Ben Seipel – Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2025
The purpose of this study was to validate a novel reading comprehension assessment for college students named MOCCA-College. A random sample of college students (N = 63, average age of 22.5) were recruited from various education programs (e.g., first-year courses, TRIO, SONA) and completed MOCCA-College Online and were later recruited to complete…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Reading Tests, College Students, Test Validity
