NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kang, Yewon; Ha, Hyorim; Lee, Hee Seung – Educational Psychology Review, 2023
Natural category learning is important in science education. One strategy that has been empirically supported for enhancing category learning is testing, which facilitates not only the learning of previously studied information (backward testing effect) but also the learning of newly studied information (forward testing effect). However, in…
Descriptors: Science Education, Science Tests, Testing, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Amanda A. Wolkowitz; Russell Smith – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2024
A decision consistency (DC) index is an estimate of the consistency of a classification decision on an exam. More specifically, DC estimates the percentage of examinees that would have the same classification decision on an exam if they were to retake the same or a parallel form of the exam again without memory of taking the exam the first time.…
Descriptors: Testing, Test Reliability, Replication (Evaluation), Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Park, Seohee; Kim, Kyung Yong; Lee, Won-Chan – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
Multiple measures, such as multiple content domains or multiple types of performance, are used in various testing programs to classify examinees for screening or selection. Despite the popular usages of multiple measures, there is little research on classification consistency and accuracy of multiple measures. Accordingly, this study introduces an…
Descriptors: Testing, Computation, Classification, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
V. N. Vimal Rao; Jeffrey K. Bye; Sashank Varma – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2024
The 0.05 boundary within Null Hypothesis Statistical Testing (NHST) "has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move" (to quote Douglas Adams). Here, we move past meta-scientific arguments and ask an empirical question: What is the psychological standing of the 0.05 boundary for statistical significance? We…
Descriptors: Psychological Patterns, Statistical Analysis, Testing, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dalia Khairy; Nouf Alharbi; Mohamed A. Amasha; Marwa F. Areed; Salem Alkhalaf; Rania A. Abougalala – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
Student outcomes are of great importance in higher education institutions. Accreditation bodies focus on them as an indicator to measure the performance and effectiveness of the institution. Forecasting students' academic performance is crucial for every educational establishment seeking to enhance performance and perseverance of its students and…
Descriptors: Prediction, Tests, Scores, Information Retrieval
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eunsook Kim; Nathaniel von der Embse – Journal of Experimental Education, 2024
Using data from multiple informants has long been considered best practice in education. However, multiple informants often disagree on similar constructs, complicating decision-making. Polynomial regression and response-surface analysis (PRA) is often used to test the congruence effect between multiple informants on an outcome. However, PRA…
Descriptors: Congruence (Psychology), Information Sources, Best Practices, Regression (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rios, Joseph A. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2022
Testing programs are confronted with the decision of whether to report individual scores for examinees that have engaged in rapid guessing (RG). As noted by the "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing," this decision should be based on a documented criterion that determines score exclusion. To this end, a number of heuristic…
Descriptors: Testing, Guessing (Tests), Academic Ability, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Del Siegle; D. Betsy McCoach; E. Jean Gubbins; Carolyn M. Callahan – Grantee Submission, 2026
Over the past decade, the National Center for Research on Gifted Education (NCRGE), funded by the Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program, has conducted large-scale, multi-method studies to improve equity in the identification of and instructional support for gifted students. NCRGE has identified barriers and promising…
Descriptors: Gifted Education, Academically Gifted, Individualized Instruction, Equal Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Del Siegle; D. Betsy McCoach; E. Jean Gubbins; Carolyn M. Callahan – Gifted Child Today, 2026
Over the past decade, the National Center for Research on Gifted Education (NCRGE), funded by the Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program, has conducted large-scale, multi-method studies to improve equity in the identification of and instructional support for gifted students. NCRGE has identified barriers and promising…
Descriptors: Gifted Education, Academically Gifted, Individualized Instruction, Equal Education