Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Scripts | 3 |
| Standards | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Evaluators | 2 |
| Reliability | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Active Learning | 1 |
| Art Education | 1 |
| Class Activities | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gill, Tim – Research Matters, 2022
In Comparative Judgement (CJ) exercises, examiners are asked to look at a selection of candidate scripts (with marks removed) and order them in terms of which they believe display the best quality. By including scripts from different examination sessions, the results of these exercises can be used to help with maintaining standards. Results from…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Scripts, Standards
Flynn, Rosalind M. – Journal for Learning through the Arts, 2022
Prior to the 1990s, the term "arts integration" rarely--if ever--appeared in educational literature. The term may be new, but educators have been involving students in arts learning processes for centuries. In particular, teachers have long harnessed the power of drama to engage students in arts-integrated learning activities. Articles…
Descriptors: Drama, Art Education, Integrated Activities, Scripts
Leech, Tony; Chambers, Lucy – Research Matters, 2022
Two of the central issues in comparative judgement (CJ), which are perhaps underexplored compared to questions of the method's reliability and technical quality, are "what processes do judges use to make their decisions" and "what features do they focus on when making their decisions?" This article discusses both, in the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Evaluators, Reliability

Peer reviewed
