Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Climate | 1 |
| Evaluation | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Information Sources | 1 |
| Metacognition | 1 |
| Prior Learning | 1 |
| Prompting | 1 |
| Protocol Analysis | 1 |
| Reader Response | 1 |
| Reading Comprehension | 1 |
| Reading Processes | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
Author
| Andrew Potter | 1 |
| Danielle S. McNamara | 1 |
| Joseph P. Magliano | 1 |
| Katerina Christhilf | 1 |
| Kathryn S. McCarthy | 1 |
| Laura K. Allen | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKaterina Christhilf; Andrew Potter; Joseph P. Magliano; Kathryn S. McCarthy; Laura K. Allen; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2025
This study investigates how learners' constructed responses, specifically typed thoughts prompted during multiple-document reading, reveal cognitive strategies used to integrate and make sense of complex information. Undergraduate students (n = 73) read four texts on climate change and generated constructed responses to one of three types of…
Descriptors: Reading Processes, Reader Response, Prompting, Reading Strategies
