Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Prediction | 2 |
| Readability | 2 |
| Readability Formulas | 2 |
| Cloze Procedure | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Outcome Measures | 1 |
| Response Rates… | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Field Methods | 1 |
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Olney, Andrew M. – Grantee Submission, 2022
Cloze items are a foundational approach to assessing readability. However, they require human data collection, thus making them impractical in automated metrics. The present study revisits the idea of assessing readability with cloze items and compares human cloze scores and readability judgments with predictions made by T5, a popular deep…
Descriptors: Readability, Cloze Procedure, Scores, Prediction
Stenger, Rachel; Olson, Kristen; Smyth, Jolene D. – Field Methods, 2023
Questionnaire designers use readability measures to ensure that questions can be understood by the target population. The most common measure is the Flesch-Kincaid Grade level, but other formulas exist. This article compares six different readability measures across 150 questions in a self-administered questionnaire, finding notable variation in…
Descriptors: Readability, Readability Formulas, Computer Assisted Testing, Evaluation Methods

Peer reviewed
Direct link
