Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Meta Analysis | 2 |
| Statistical Significance | 2 |
| Cancer | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Intervals | 1 |
| Medical Research | 1 |
| Patients | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| Psychological Patterns | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Becker, Gerhild | 1 |
| Buroh, Sabine | 1 |
| Jeffrey K. Bye | 1 |
| Meerpohl, Joerg J. | 1 |
| Rohe, Miriam S. | 1 |
| Sashank Varma | 1 |
| Schwarzer, Guido | 1 |
| Siemens, Waldemar | 1 |
| V. N. Vimal Rao | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkV. N. Vimal Rao; Jeffrey K. Bye; Sashank Varma – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2024
The 0.05 boundary within Null Hypothesis Statistical Testing (NHST) "has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move" (to quote Douglas Adams). Here, we move past meta-scientific arguments and ask an empirical question: What is the psychological standing of the 0.05 boundary for statistical significance? We…
Descriptors: Psychological Patterns, Statistical Analysis, Testing, Statistical Significance
Siemens, Waldemar; Meerpohl, Joerg J.; Rohe, Miriam S.; Buroh, Sabine; Schwarzer, Guido; Becker, Gerhild – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Using the Hartung-Knapp method and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) in random-effects meta-analyses is recommended by experts but rarely applied. Therefore, we aimed to reevaluate statistically significant meta-analyses using the Hartung-Knapp method and 95% PIs. In this methodological study, three databases were searched from January 2010 to July…
Descriptors: Cancer, Meta Analysis, Medical Research, Patients
