Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| College Science | 1 |
| Equal Education | 1 |
| Geology | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Graduate Study | 1 |
| Individual Development | 1 |
| Mastery Learning | 1 |
| Metacognition | 1 |
| Minority Group Students | 1 |
| Reflection | 1 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Geoscience… | 1 |
Author
| Amanda H. Schmidt | 1 |
| Elisabeth S. Falk | 1 |
| Elisabeth S. Nadin | 1 |
| Karen E. Kohfeld | 1 |
| Karla Parsons Hubbard | 1 |
| Katharine E. Johanesen | 1 |
| Lily L. Claiborne | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKatharine E. Johanesen; Lily L. Claiborne; Elisabeth S. Falk; Karla Parsons Hubbard; Karen E. Kohfeld; Elisabeth S. Nadin; Amanda H. Schmidt – Journal of Geoscience Education, 2024
Conventional letter- or number-based grading systems, though ubiquitous at all levels of education, do not optimize the learning experience. The philosophy of "ungrading" includes a variety of approaches that decenter or even remove numeric or letter scoring of student work in favor of descriptive feedback, opportunities for revision,…
Descriptors: Grading, Geology, College Science, Undergraduate Study
