NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Kellie L. Stewart – ProQuest LLC, 2023
This qualitative study examined how sign language interpreters make decisions regarding whether to accept or decline an interpreting assignment. This ethical decision holds the potential for a successful or unsuccessful interpreted interaction which can harm deaf consumers. This study is the first to examine this topic. Thus, the Literature Review…
Descriptors: Sign Language, Deaf Interpreting, Decision Making, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maranda K. Jones; Megan Y. Roberts – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2024
Purpose: Caregivers of deaf/hard of hearing infants are faced with challenging decisions regarding their child's communication method. The purpose of the current research note is to characterize the advice that caregivers receive and value as well as the factors that influence caregivers' decision making. Method: The current study enrolled 105…
Descriptors: Hearing Impairments, Deafness, Interpersonal Communication, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Corrine Occhino; Ryan Lidster; Leah C. Geer; Jason Listman; Peter C. Hauser – Language Testing, 2024
We describe the development and initial validation of the "ASL Fingerspelling and Number Comprehension Test" (ASL FaN-CT), a test of recognition proficiency for fingerspelled words in American Sign Language (ASL). Despite the relative frequency of fingerspelling in ASL discourse, learners commonly struggle to produce and perceive…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Test Construction, Finger Spelling, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cohen-Koka, Shirit; Nir, Bracha; Meir, Irit – Sign Language Studies, 2023
This article discusses the function of a particular feature of sign language--mouth action--as it is expressed in various discourse contexts. Specifically, we examine forms of mouthing and mouth gesture as they are used in signed narrative and expository texts, highlighting the signers' choices during the production of these two text types. We…
Descriptors: Sign Language, Human Body, Computational Linguistics, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wright, Emily; Stojanovik, Vesna; Serratrice, Ludovica – Deafness & Education International, 2023
Parents of deaf children must decide whether to raise their child using spoken and/or signed language. Multilingual parents have the additional decision of whether to use multiple spoken languages (with or without a signed language as well). These communication choices -- which can be both explicit and implicit -- can change over time and are…
Descriptors: Deafness, Speech Communication, Sign Language, Parent Child Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lorang, Emily; Maltman, Nell; Venker, Courtney; Eith, Alyson; Sterling, Audra – Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2022
This survey study examined augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) practices reported by early intervention speech-language pathologists (SLPs) across the United States (N = 376). The study examined (a) types of AAC that SLPs reported using (i.e., sign language, photographs, pictures, symbols, talking switches, and iPad apps or dedicated…
Descriptors: Speech Language Pathology, Allied Health Personnel, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Early Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Han, Chao; Xiao, Xiaoyan – Language Testing, 2022
The quality of sign language interpreting (SLI) is a gripping construct among practitioners, educators and researchers, calling for reliable and valid assessment. There has been a diverse array of methods in the extant literature to measure SLI quality, ranging from traditional error analysis to recent rubric scoring. In this study, we want to…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Sign Language, Deaf Interpreting, Evaluators