Most randomized field experiments experience some attrition. Moreover, the extent of attrition may differ by treatment condition in systematic, non-random ways, biasing estimates of treatment effects and contributing to invalid inferences. We address concerns about non-random attrition by quantifying the conditions necessary in the attritted data…

By design, randomized experiments (XPs) rule out bias from confounded selection of participants into conditions. Quasi-experiments (QEs) are often considered second-best because they do not share this benefit. However, when results from XPs are used to generalize causal impacts, the benefit from unconfounded selection into conditions may be offset…