NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Röver, Christian; Friede, Tim – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
The variance-stabilizing Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transform was originally proposed for inference on single proportions. Subsequently, its use has been suggested in the context of meta-analysis of proportions. While some erratic behavior has been observed previously, here we point out and illustrate general issues of monotonicity and…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Research Problems, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maxi Schulz; Malte Kramer; Oliver Kuss; Tim Mathes – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
In sparse data meta-analyses (with few trials or zero events), conventional methods may distort results. Although better-performing one-stage methods have become available in recent years, their implementation remains limited in practice. This study examines the impact of using conventional methods compared to one-stage models by re-analysing…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Data Analysis, Research Methodology, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maya B. Mathur – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
As traditionally conceived, publication bias arises from selection operating on a collection of individually unbiased estimates. A canonical form of such selection across studies (SAS) is the preferential publication of affirmative studies (i.e., those with significant, positive estimates) versus nonaffirmative studies (i.e., those with…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Research Reports, Research Methodology, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Weibel, Stephanie; Popp, Maria; Reis, Stefanie; Skoetz, Nicole; Garner, Paul; Sydenham, Emma – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Evidence synthesis findings depend on the assumption that the included studies follow good clinical practice and results are not fabricated or false. Studies which are problematic due to scientific misconduct, poor research practice, or honest error may distort evidence synthesis findings. Authors of evidence synthesis need transparent mechanisms…
Descriptors: Identification, Randomized Controlled Trials, Integrity, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stanley, T. D.; Doucouliagos, Hristos; Ioannidis, John P. A. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Recent, high-profile, large-scale, preregistered failures to replicate uncover that many highly-regarded experiments are "false positives"; that is, statistically significant results of underlying null effects. Large surveys of research reveal that statistical power is often low and inadequate. When the research record includes selective…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Replication (Evaluation), Statistical Analysis, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seo, Michael; Furukawa, Toshi A.; Karyotaki, Eirini; Efthimiou, Orestis – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Clinical prediction models are widely used in modern clinical practice. Such models are often developed using individual patient data (IPD) from a single study, but often there are IPD available from multiple studies. This allows using meta-analytical methods for developing prediction models, increasing power and precision. Different studies,…
Descriptors: Prediction, Models, Patients, Data Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schauer, Jacob M.; Lee, Jihyun; Diaz, Karina; Pigott, Therese D. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Missing covariates is a common issue when fitting meta-regression models. Standard practice for handling missing covariates tends to involve one of two approaches. In a complete-case analysis, effect sizes for which relevant covariates are missing are omitted from model estimation. Alternatively, researchers have employed the so-called…
Descriptors: Statistical Bias, Meta Analysis, Regression (Statistics), Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yuan Tian; Xi Yang; Suhail A. Doi; Luis Furuya-Kanamori; Lifeng Lin; Joey S. W. Kwong; Chang Xu – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
RobotReviewer is a tool for automatically assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials, but there is limited evidence of its reliability. We evaluated the agreement between RobotReviewer and humans regarding the risk of bias assessment based on 1955 randomized controlled trials. The risk of bias in these trials was assessed via two…
Descriptors: Risk, Randomized Controlled Trials, Classification, Robotics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Papadimitropoulou, Katerina; Riley, Richard D.; Dekkers, Olaf M.; Stijnen, Theo; le Cessie, Saskia – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Meta-analysis is a widely used methodology to combine evidence from different sources examining a common research phenomenon, to obtain a quantitative summary of the studied phenomenon. In the medical field, multiple studies investigate the effectiveness of new treatments and meta-analysis is largely performed to generate the summary (average)…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Meta Analysis, Evidence, Medicine
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bramley, Paul; López-López, José A.; Higgins, Julian P. T. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
Standard meta-analysis methods are vulnerable to bias from incomplete reporting of results (both publication and outcome reporting bias) and poor study quality. Several alternative methods have been proposed as being less vulnerable to such biases. To evaluate these claims independently we simulated study results under a broad range of conditions…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Bias, Research Problems, Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nejstgaard, Camilla Hansen; Lundh, Andreas; Abdi, Suhayb; Clayton, Gemma; Gelle, Mustafe Hassan Adan; Laursen, David Ruben Teindl; Olorisade, Babatunde Kazeem; Savovic, Jelena; Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Randomised trials are often funded by commercial companies and methodological studies support a widely held suspicion that commercial funding may influence trial results and conclusions. However, these studies often have a risk of confounding and reporting bias. The risk of confounding is markedly reduced in meta-epidemiological studies that…
Descriptors: Medical Research, Randomized Controlled Trials, Corporations, Financial Support
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Qianying; Liao, Jing; Lapata, Mirella; Macleod, Malcolm – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
We sought to apply natural language processing to the task of automatic risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature, which could speed the process of systematic review, provide information to guide research improvement activity, and support translation from preclinical to clinical research. We use 7840 full-text publications describing…
Descriptors: Risk, Natural Language Processing, Medical Research, Networks