Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Data Collection | 2 |
Health Promotion | 2 |
Program Evaluation | 2 |
Best Practices | 1 |
Child Development | 1 |
Communicable Diseases | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
Data Use | 1 |
Disease Control | 1 |
Evaluation | 1 |
Evidence Based Practice | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
American Journal of Evaluation | 2 |
Author
Beth C. Weitzman | 1 |
Carolyn A. Berry | 1 |
Chen, Molly | 1 |
Colaço, Rajeev | 1 |
Courtney Abrams | 1 |
Fitch, Elizabeth | 1 |
Flueckiger, Rebecca M. | 1 |
Kayla M. Fennelly | 1 |
Margaret M. Paul | 1 |
Meekins, Meagan | 1 |
Rachel E. Massar | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Carolyn A. Berry; Courtney Abrams; Margaret M. Paul; Rachel E. Massar; Kayla M. Fennelly; Beth C. Weitzman – American Journal of Evaluation, 2025
Qualitative interviews and focus groups are commonly used methods to elicit participants' voices in program evaluations. However, the use of these data-gathering methods can fall short of the goal; even with open-ended questions, the protocols guiding and shaping interviews and focus groups heavily reflect the evaluators' understanding and…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Photography, Visual Aids, Interviews
Stelmach, Rachel D.; Fitch, Elizabeth; Chen, Molly; Meekins, Meagan; Flueckiger, Rebecca M.; Colaço, Rajeev – American Journal of Evaluation, 2022
Monitoring, evaluation, and research activities generate important data, but they often fail to change policies or programs. In addition, local program staff and partners often feel disconnected from these activities, which undermines their ownership of data and results. To bridge the gaps between monitoring, evaluation, and research and to give…
Descriptors: Evidence Based Practice, Evaluation, Research, Global Approach