Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Charleen J. Gust | 1 |
| Christine M. Steeger | 1 |
| Fred C. Pampel | 1 |
| Maria Zhu | 1 |
| Pamela R. Buckley | 1 |
| Sarah Gonzalez Coffin | 1 |
| Sheba M. Aikawa | 1 |
| Vanessa D. Miller | 1 |
| Ying Shi | 1 |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Fourteenth Amendment | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Pamela R. Buckley; Charleen J. Gust; Sarah Gonzalez Coffin; Sheba M. Aikawa; Christine M. Steeger; Fred C. Pampel – Prevention Science, 2025
Evidence reveals that minoritized groups face disparities, underscoring the need for interventions to address behavioral health inequities. This review examined which minoritized populations are represented in evidence-based preventive interventions (EBPIs) and whether they equitably benefit from these programs. Using the Blueprints for Healthy…
Descriptors: Minority Group Students, Evidence Based Practice, Intervention, Prevention
Ying Shi; Maria Zhu – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2021
Well-documented racial disparities in rates of exclusionary discipline may arise from differences in hard-to-observe student behavior or bias, in which treatment for the same behavior varies by student race or ethnicity. We provide evidence for the presence of bias using statewide administrative data that contain rich details on individual…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Discipline Policy, Punishment, Racial Discrimination
Vanessa D. Miller – ProQuest LLC, 2020
This study examines the United States Supreme Court's use of social science research in Fourteenth Amendment race-based discrimination cases in professional and graduate school admissions. It discusses how the Court uses (or does not use) social science research in its interpretation of "equal protection" and "discrimination"…
Descriptors: Citizenship, Constitutional Law, Federal Courts, Equal Protection

Peer reviewed
Direct link
