Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
| Intelligence Tests | 6 |
| Test Use | 6 |
| Cognitive Ability | 3 |
| Children | 2 |
| Cognitive Tests | 2 |
| Guidelines | 2 |
| Psychometrics | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Vocabulary | 2 |
| Academically Gifted | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| American Journal on… | 1 |
| Assessment for Effective… | 1 |
| Journal of Intelligence | 1 |
| Journal of Psycholinguistic… | 1 |
| Language Testing | 1 |
| National Association for… | 1 |
Author
| Alexander Kolevzon | 1 |
| Antonio Y. Hardan | 1 |
| Audrey Thurm | 1 |
| Charis Eng | 1 |
| Craig M. Powell | 1 |
| Cristan Farmer | 1 |
| Darcy A. Krueger | 1 |
| Delello, Julie | 1 |
| Deygers, Bart | 1 |
| Dickinson, Joël | 1 |
| E. Martina Bebin | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCristan Farmer; Audrey Thurm; Tanvi Das; E. Martina Bebin; Jonathan A. Bernstein; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Joseph D. Buxbaum; Charis Eng; Thomas Frazier; Antonio Y. Hardan; Alexander Kolevzon; Darcy A. Krueger; Julian A. Martinez-Agosto; Hope Northrup; Craig M. Powell; Latha Valluripalli Soorya; Joyce Y. Wu; Mustafa Sahin – American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 2025
Developmental domains, such as cognitive, language, and motor, are key concepts of interest in longitudinal studies of intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Normative scores (e.g., IQ) are often used to operationalize performance on standardized tests of these concepts, but it is the interval-distributed person-ability scores that are…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Intelligence Tests, Cognitive Ability, Intellectual Disability
Download full textNational Association for Gifted Children, 2018
Comprehensive, individual intelligence tests can be invaluable when used as part of a multi-faceted approach to identify gifted and twice exceptional children. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) is a popular cognitive assessment for this purpose. This statement addresses guidelines for use of the WISC-V in the assessment of gifted…
Descriptors: Children, Intelligence Tests, Test Use, Academically Gifted
Ferguson, Ryan J.; Roy-Charland, Annie; Dickinson, Joël – Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2018
Psychometric tests related to vocabulary assessments are, for the most part, restricted in their use by trained professionals and/or are costly. These restrictions limit their use, especially for research purposes. To circumvent these limitations, the Raney Vocabulary Measure was created for assessing vocabulary proficiency, specifically for…
Descriptors: Adults, Intelligence Tests, Vocabulary, Language Tests
Deygers, Bart; Vanbuel, Marieke – Language Testing, 2022
The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) is a widely used test of receptive vocabulary, but no researchers to date have examined the performance of low-educated, low-literate L2 adults, or compared these individuals' performances to their more highly educated peers. In this study, we used many-facet Rasch analysis and mixed-effects linear…
Descriptors: Literacy, Educational Background, Verbal Ability, Intelligence Tests
Schmitz, Florian; Wilhelm, Oliver – Journal of Intelligence, 2019
Current taxonomies of intelligence comprise two factors of mental speed, clerical speed (Gs), and elementary cognitive speed (Gt). Both originated from different research traditions and are conceptualized as dissociable constructs in current taxonomies. However, previous research suggests that tasks of one category can be transferred into the…
Descriptors: Taxonomy, Intelligence Tests, Testing, Test Format
Rueter, Jessica A.; McWhorter, Rochell; Delello, Julie – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2019
The purpose of this article is to understand the decision-making processes by assessment personnel when choosing instruments to evaluate students with learning disabilities. Eight school personnel responsible for the evaluation of students in Texas participated in face-to-face, semistructured interviews. The instruments chosen were based on a…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Learning Disabilities, Identification, Student Placement
