Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Correlation | 5 |
| Scoring Formulas | 5 |
| Scores | 3 |
| Data Analysis | 2 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
| Scoring Rubrics | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Achievement Rating | 1 |
| Anatomy | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Anatomical Sciences Education | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Journal of College Science… | 1 |
| Journal of Special Education | 1 |
| Practical Assessment,… | 1 |
Author
| Hortsch, Michael | 1 |
| Hwang, Charles | 1 |
| Johnson, Jessica | 1 |
| Lee, Minji K. | 1 |
| Lloyd, John W. | 1 |
| Melican, Gerald J. | 1 |
| Purkiss, Joel | 1 |
| Rhodes, Ashley E. | 1 |
| Romig, John Elwood | 1 |
| Rozell, Timothy G. | 1 |
| Scott, Sara | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wyse, Adam E. – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2018
One common modification to the Angoff standard-setting method is to have panelists round their ratings to the nearest 0.05 or 0.10 instead of 0.01. Several reasons have been offered as to why it may make sense to have panelists round their ratings to the nearest 0.05 or 0.10. In this article, we examine one reason that has been suggested, which is…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Evaluation Criteria, Scoring Formulas, Achievement Rating
Lee, Minji K.; Sweeney, Kevin; Melican, Gerald J. – Educational Assessment, 2017
This study investigates the relationships among factor correlations, inter-item correlations, and the reliability estimates of subscores, providing a guideline with respect to psychometric properties of useful subscores. In addition, it compares subscore estimation methods with respect to reliability and distinctness. The subscore estimation…
Descriptors: Scores, Test Construction, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Rozell, Timothy G.; Johnson, Jessica; Sexten, Andrea; Rhodes, Ashley E. – Journal of College Science Teaching, 2017
Students in a junior- and senior-level Anatomy and Physiology course have the opportunity to correct missed exam questions ("regrade") and earn up to half of the original points missed. The three objectives of this study were to determine if: (a) performance on the regrade assignment was correlated with scores on subsequent exams, (b)…
Descriptors: Physiology, Scores, Grades (Scholastic), Exit Examinations
Romig, John Elwood; Therrien, William J.; Lloyd, John W. – Journal of Special Education, 2017
We used meta-analysis to examine the criterion validity of four scoring procedures used in curriculum-based measurement of written language. A total of 22 articles representing 21 studies (N = 21) met the inclusion criteria. Results indicated that two scoring procedures, correct word sequences and correct minus incorrect sequences, have acceptable…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Curriculum Based Assessment, Written Language, Scoring Formulas
Zaidi, Nikki B.; Hwang, Charles; Scott, Sara; Stallard, Stefanie; Purkiss, Joel; Hortsch, Michael – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2017
Bloom's taxonomy was adopted to create a subject-specific scoring tool for histology multiple-choice questions (MCQs). This Bloom's Taxonomy Histology Tool (BTHT) was used to analyze teacher- and student-generated quiz and examination questions from a graduate level histology course. Multiple-choice questions using histological images were…
Descriptors: Taxonomy, Anatomy, Graduate Students, Scoring Formulas

Peer reviewed
Direct link
