Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| College Programs | 3 |
| Course Organization | 3 |
| Curriculum Design | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Behavioral Objectives | 1 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Collegiality | 1 |
| Developmental Programs | 1 |
| Educational Practices | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Ashe, Diana L. | 1 |
| Brown, Victoria S. | 1 |
| Goldwasser, Molly | 1 |
| Harris, Eugenia | 1 |
| Lewis, David | 1 |
| Martin, Kimberly | 1 |
| TenHuisen, Matthew L. | 1 |
| Toussaint, Mario | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
| North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textGoldwasser, Molly; Martin, Kimberly; Harris, Eugenia – Journal of Developmental Education, 2017
This paper presents a framework for educators, administrators, and researchers to assess distinct facets of developmental education programs. The researchers review the literature on best practices in developmental education with regards to program cost, program structure, and student placement procedures. This paper also identifies seven model…
Descriptors: Developmental Programs, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Best Practices
Direct linkAshe, Diana L.; TenHuisen, Matthew L. – Journal of Faculty Development, 2018
While most academic leadership training focuses on department chairs and those already in or identified for those positions, the NextUp Faculty Leadership Development Fellows program includes faculty who are considering academic leadership of any kind in their careers. Sixty faculty members have joined NextUp; forty-one have graduated and 19 are…
Descriptors: Leadership Training, Teacher Leadership, Fellowships, Program Descriptions
Brown, Victoria S.; Toussaint, Mario; Lewis, David – Online Learning, 2018
Four course development models were compared over a 3-year period, based upon student perceptions of the integration of the Quality Matters (QM) Standards, course structure, and quality. Points of comparison included (a) faculty training, (b) instructional designer supported, (c) additional QM training course, and (d) no training or support used.…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Educational Quality, Curriculum Design, Models
