NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sigrún Eyrúnardóttir Clark; Norha Vera San Juan; Thomas Moniz; Rebecca Appleton; Phoebe Barnett; Cecilia Vindrola-Padros – Evaluation Review, 2025
Rapid approaches are essential when resources are limited and when findings are required in real-time to inform decisions. Limitations exist in their design and implementation, which can lead to a reduced level of trust in findings. This review sought to map the methods used across rapid evaluations and research to facilitate timeliness and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Research Methodology, Credibility, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
William Rhodes; Gerald Gaes; William Sabol – Evaluation Review, 2025
When individuals are released from prison, they typically enter a period of post confinement community supervision. While under community supervision, their behaviors are subject to special conditions requiring them to report to supervisors and prohibiting certain behaviors such as drug and alcohol use. Many supervisees are returned to prison…
Descriptors: Criminals, Recidivism, Crime Prevention, Supervision
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thomas S. Dee – Evaluation Review, 2025
The recognition that researcher discretion coupled with unconscious biases and motivated reasoning sometimes leads to false findings ("p-hacking") led to the broad embrace of study preregistration and other open-science practices in experimental research. Paradoxically, the preregistration of quasi-experimental studies remains uncommon…
Descriptors: Quasiexperimental Design, Program Evaluation, Policy Analysis, Research Problems