Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 2 |
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Longitudinal Studies | 2 |
| Reading Tests | 2 |
| Screening Tests | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Curriculum Based Assessment | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bonifay, Wesley | 1 |
| Burns, Matthew K. | 1 |
| Nelson, Peter M. | 1 |
| Van Norman, Ethan R. | 1 |
| VanDerHeyden, Amanda | 1 |
| VanDerHeyden, Amanda M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Minnesota Comprehensive… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
VanDerHeyden, Amanda M.; Burns, Matthew K.; Bonifay, Wesley – School Psychology Review, 2018
Screening is necessary to detect risk and prevent reading failure. Yet the amount of screening that commonly occurs in U.S. schools may undermine its value, creating more error in decision making and lost instructional opportunity. This 2-year longitudinal study examined the decision accuracy associated with collecting concurrent reading screening…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Decision Making, Accuracy, Reading Skills
Nelson, Peter M.; Van Norman, Ethan R.; VanDerHeyden, Amanda – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2017
We used existing reading (n = 1,498) and math (n = 2,260) data to evaluate state test scores for screening middle school students. In Phase 1, state test data were used to create a research-derived cut score that was optimal for predicting state test performance the following year. In Phase 2, those cut scores were applied with future cohorts.…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Longitudinal Studies, Benchmarking, Middle School Students

Peer reviewed
Direct link
