Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Collaborative Writing | 3 |
| Electronic Publishing | 3 |
| Readability | 3 |
| Encyclopedias | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Anatomy | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Drug Therapy | 1 |
| Editing | 1 |
| Grades (Scholastic) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAzer, Samy A.; Alsharafi, Aya A. – Advances in Physiology Education, 2023
Pharmacy students tend to use Wikipedia as a quick resource of knowledge. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of content and readability level of Wikipedia articles on chemotherapeutics, using quality and readability tools. Using the British National Formulary (BNF-2018) and ClinicalTrials.gov, we identified 188 chemotherapeutic drugs. We…
Descriptors: Pharmaceutical Education, Encyclopedias, Collaborative Writing, Electronic Publishing
Suwannakhan, Athikhun; Casanova-Martínez, Daniel; Yurasakpong, Laphatrada; Montriwat, Punchalee; Meemon, Krai; Limpanuparb, Taweetham – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2020
Forty anatomy articles were sampled from English Wikipedia and assessed quantitatively and qualitatively. Quantitatively, each article's edit history was analyzed by Wikipedia X-tools, references and media were counted manually, and two readability indices were used to evaluate article readability. This analysis revealed that each article was…
Descriptors: Encyclopedias, Collaborative Writing, Electronic Publishing, Anatomy
Download full textLi, Haiying; Cai, Zhiqiang; Graesser, Arthur – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2016
In this paper, we applied the crowdsourcing approach to develop an automated popularity summary scoring, called wild summaries. In contrast, the golden standard summaries generated by one or more experts are called expert summaries. The innovation of our study is to compute LSA (Latent Semantic Analysis) similarities between target summary and…
Descriptors: Peer Acceptance, Electronic Publishing, Collaborative Writing, Grading
