NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Van Gulick, Ana E.; Gauthier, Isabel – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
In classic category learning studies, subjects typically learn to assign items to 1 of 2 categories, with no further distinction between how items on each side of the category boundary should be treated. In real life, however, we often learn categories that dictate further processing goals, for instance, with objects in only 1 category requiring…
Descriptors: Classification, Learning, Prediction, Experience
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yang, Mu; Lewis, Freeman C.; Sarvi, Michael S.; Foley, Gillian M.; Crawley, Jacqueline N. – Learning & Memory, 2015
Chromosomal 16p11.2 deletion syndrome frequently presents with intellectual disabilities, speech delays, and autism. Here we investigated the Dolmetsch line of 16p11.2 heterozygous (+/-) mice on a range of cognitive tasks with different neuroanatomical substrates. Robust novel object recognition deficits were replicated in two cohorts of 16p11.2…
Descriptors: Intellectual Disability, Delayed Speech, Autism, Genetics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sawaki, Risa; Katayama, Jun'ichi – Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2009
Attentional capture for distractors is enhanced by increasing the difficulty of discrimination between the standard and the target in the three-stimulus oddball paradigm. In this study, we investigated the cognitive mechanism of this modulation of attentional capture. Event-related brain potentials were recorded from participants while they…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Attention, Spatial Ability, Cognitive Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bussey, Timothy J.; Padain, Tina L.; Skillings, Elizabeth A.; Winters, Boyer D.; Morton, A. Jennifer; Saksida, Lisa M. – Learning & Memory, 2008
The touchscreen testing method for rodents is a computer-automated behavioral testing method that allows computer graphic stimuli to be presented to rodents and the rodents to respond to the computer screen via a nose-poke directly to the stimulus. The advantages of this method are numerous; however, a systematic study of the parameters that…
Descriptors: Computer Graphics, Testing, Animals, Computer Assisted Testing