NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Léna Kolodzienski; Rémy Versace; Camille Gramaje; Hanna Chainay; Gaën Plancher – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2025
Numerous studies have shown cognitive benefits when children engage in activities in natural environments (NE). These benefits may stem from the restorative qualities of nature, which help reduce stress and replenish attentional capacities. According to embodied cognition theories, cognitive processes are shaped by our interactions with the…
Descriptors: Physical Environment, Outdoor Education, Educational Benefits, Psychomotor Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sabri, Mohd Anas Mohd; Khamis, Nor Kamaliana; Tahir, Mohd Faizal Mat; Wahid, Zaliha; Kamal, Ahmad; Ihsan, Ariffin Mohd; Sulong, Abu Bakar; Abdullah, Shahrum – International Education Studies, 2013
One of the major concerns of the Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC) is the need for an effective monitoring and evaluation of program outcome domains that can be associated with courses taught under the Mechanical Engineering program. However, an effective monitoring method that can determine the results of each program outcome using Bloom's…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Engineering, Engineering Education, Curriculum Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Futo, Judit; Teglas, Erno; Csibra, Gergely; Gergely, Gyorgy – Cognition, 2010
Human infants grow up in environments populated by artifacts. In order to acquire knowledge about different kinds of human-made objects, children have to be able to focus on the information that is most relevant for sorting artifacts into categories. Traditional theories emphasize the role of superficial, perceptual features in object…
Descriptors: Infants, Psychomotor Objectives, Intervention, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Piirto, Jane; Fraas, John – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2012
Two groups of adolescents (N = 114), 61 identified-gifted adolescents (M = 22, F = 39) and 51 vocational school adolescents (M = 27, F = 26), were compared on the Overexcitability Questionnaire. Each of the five Overexcitability (OE) scores--Psychomotor, Sensual, Imaginational, Intellectual, and Emotional--was subjected to a two-way ANOVA by…
Descriptors: Gifted, Questionnaires, Effect Size, Gender Differences