Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 9 |
| Scoring | 8 |
| Writing Evaluation | 8 |
| Essay Tests | 7 |
| Essays | 6 |
| Measurement | 4 |
| Validity | 4 |
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Computer Software Evaluation | 3 |
| Psychometrics | 3 |
| Writing Instruction | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessing Writing | 9 |
Author
| Ramineni, Chaitanya | 2 |
| Chen, Jing | 1 |
| Chun, Young | 1 |
| Condon, William | 1 |
| Deane, Paul | 1 |
| Deess, Perry | 1 |
| Elliot, Norbert | 1 |
| James, Cindy L. | 1 |
| Joshi, Kamal | 1 |
| Klobucar, Andrew | 1 |
| McCloskey, Michael | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 9 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 5 |
| Postsecondary Education | 5 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ramineni, Chaitanya; Williamson, David M. – Assessing Writing, 2013
In this paper, we provide an overview of psychometric procedures and guidelines Educational Testing Service (ETS) uses to evaluate automated essay scoring for operational use. We briefly describe the e-rater system, the procedures and criteria used to evaluate e-rater, implications for a range of potential uses of e-rater, and directions for…
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Guidelines, Scoring, Psychometrics
Deane, Paul – Assessing Writing, 2013
This paper examines the construct measured by automated essay scoring (AES) systems. AES systems measure features of the text structure, linguistic structure, and conventional print form of essays; as such, the systems primarily measure text production skills. In the current state-of-the-art, AES provide little direct evidence about such matters…
Descriptors: Scoring, Essays, Text Structure, Writing (Composition)
Ramineni, Chaitanya – Assessing Writing, 2013
In this paper, I describe the design and evaluation of automated essay scoring (AES) models for an institution's writing placement program. Information was gathered on admitted student writing performance at a science and technology research university in the northeastern United States. Under timed conditions, first-year students (N = 879) were…
Descriptors: Validity, Comparative Analysis, Internet, Student Placement
Klobucar, Andrew; Elliot, Norbert; Deess, Perry; Rudniy, Oleksandr; Joshi, Kamal – Assessing Writing, 2013
This study investigated the use of automated essay scoring (AES) to identify at-risk students enrolled in a first-year university writing course. An application of AES, the "Criterion"[R] Online Writing Evaluation Service was evaluated through a methodology focusing on construct modelling, response processes, disaggregation, extrapolation,…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Scoring, Writing Instruction, Essays
Condon, William – Assessing Writing, 2013
Automated Essay Scoring (AES) has garnered a great deal of attention from the rhetoric and composition/writing studies community since the Educational Testing Service began using e-rater[R] and the "Criterion"[R] Online Writing Evaluation Service as products in scoring writing tests, and most of the responses have been negative. While the…
Descriptors: Measurement, Psychometrics, Evaluation Methods, Educational Testing
Weigle, Sara Cushing – Assessing Writing, 2013
This article presents considerations for using automated scoring systems to evaluate second language writing. A distinction is made between English language learners in English-medium educational systems and those studying English in their own countries for a variety of purposes, and between learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in a second…
Descriptors: Scoring, Second Language Learning, Second Languages, English Language Learners
Chen, Jing; White, Sheida; McCloskey, Michael; Soroui, Jaleh; Chun, Young – Assessing Writing, 2011
This study investigated the comparability of paper and computer versions of a functional writing assessment administered to adults 16 and older. Three writing tasks were administered in both paper and computer modes to volunteers in the field test of an assessment of adult literacy in 2008. One set of analyses examined mode effects on scoring by…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Educational Technology
McCurry, Doug – Assessing Writing, 2010
This article considers the claim that machine scoring of writing test responses agrees with human readers as much as humans agree with other humans. These claims about the reliability of machine scoring of writing are usually based on specific and constrained writing tasks, and there is reason for asking whether machine scoring of writing requires…
Descriptors: Writing Tests, Scoring, Interrater Reliability, Computer Assisted Testing
James, Cindy L. – Assessing Writing, 2008
The scoring of student essays by computer has generated much debate and subsequent research. The majority of the research thus far has focused on validating the automated scoring tools by comparing the electronic scores to human scores of writing or other measures of writing skills, and exploring the predictive validity of the automated scores.…
Descriptors: Predictive Validity, Scoring, Electronic Equipment, Essays

Peer reviewed
Direct link
