NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20251
Since 2022 (last 5 years)2
Since 2017 (last 10 years)5
Since 2007 (last 20 years)7
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 20011
Assessments and Surveys
Child Behavior Checklist1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Melissa D. Olfert; Rebecca L. Hagedorn-Hatfield; Bailey Houghtaling; Monica K. Esquivel; Lanae B. Hood; Lillian MacNell; Jessica Soldavini; Maureen Berner; Mateja R. Savoie Roskos; Melanie D. Hingle; Georgianna R. Mann; Julia F. Waity; Linda L. Knol; Jennifer Walsh; Valerie Kern-Lyons; Christopher Paul; Keith Pearson; Jeannine R. Goetz; Marsha Spence; Elizabeth Anderson-Steeves; Elizabeth D. Wall-Bassett; J. Porter Lillis; E. Brooke Kelly; Adam Hege; Mary Catherine Fontenot; Patricia Coleman – Journal of American College Health, 2023
Objectives: To quantify the number and type of students failing to secure basic needs. Participants: Students attending 22 postsecondary schools in the United States in Fall 2019. Methods: The Adult Food Security Module and part of the #RealCollege Survey were used to measure food and housing insecurity, respectively. Logistic and linear…
Descriptors: College Students, Hunger, Housing, Homeless People
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kathleen Lynne Lane; Nathan Allen Lane; Mark Matthew Buckman; Katie Scarlett Lane Pelton; Kandace Fleming; Rebecca E. Swinburne Romine – Behavioral Disorders, 2025
We report the results of a convergent validity study examining the externalizing subscale (SRSS-E5, five items) of the adapted Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing (SRSS-IE 9) with the externalizing subscale of the Teacher Report Form (TRF) with two samples of K-12 students. Results of logistic regression and receiver…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Decision Making, Data Use, Test Validity
Carter, Ted – Kansas Association of School Boards, 2017
This report presents the findings from the Kansas Association of School Boards (KASB's) 2016-17 Enrollment Projections for the state of Kansas as a whole, and also provides instructions on how these projections can be accessed at the district level. Key Findings include: (1) Total headcount enrollment will see modest increases from 2016-17 through…
Descriptors: Enrollment Projections, Enrollment Trends, School Districts, Elementary Secondary Education
Carter, Ted – Kansas Association of School Boards, 2018
This report presents the findings from the Kansas Association of School Boards' (KASB's) 2017-18 Enrollment Projections for the state of Kansas as a whole, and also provides instructions on how these projections can be accessed at the district level. Findings include: (1) The projected enrollment is expected to increase 0.4 percent next year,…
Descriptors: Enrollment Projections, Enrollment Trends, School Districts, Elementary Secondary Education
Carter, Ted – Kansas Association of School Boards, 2019
This report summarizes the findings from the Kansas Association of School Boards (KASB) 2019-20 Enrollment Projections and describes the new methods KASB members can use to access this information. KASB's enrollment projections for the 2020-21 through 2024-25 school years indicate: (1) Total enrollment will decline from 499,331 in 2019-20 to…
Descriptors: Enrollment Projections, Enrollment Trends, School Districts, Elementary Secondary Education
Carter, Ted – Kansas Association of School Boards, 2015
This document contains headcount enrollment projections for the State of Kansas for the 2015-16 school year through the 2019-20 school year. These projections are based on resident live births in Kansas and the headcount enrollment data for previous school years. Based on the available data related to resident live births by county and previous…
Descriptors: Enrollment Trends, Statistical Data, Instructional Program Divisions, Race
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Adkins, Deborah; Kingsbury, G. Gage – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2007
At the heart of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is the call for all students to be "proficient" in reading and mathematics by 2014. Yet the law expects each state to define proficiency as it sees fit and design its own tests. This study investigated three research questions related to this policy: (1) How consistent are various…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Mathematics Tests, Test Validity, Reading Tests