Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Incidental Learning | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Intentional Learning | 1 |
| Learning Strategies | 1 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Frontline Learning Research | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Need for Cognition Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schindler, Julia; Schindler, Simon; Reinhard, Marc-André – Frontline Learning Research, 2019
Self-generated information is better recognized and recalled than read information. This so-called generation effect has been replicated several times for different types of stimulus material, different generation tasks, and retention intervals. The present study investigated the impact of individual differences in learners' disposition to engage…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Individual Differences, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level

Peer reviewed
