Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 2 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Individual Differences | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Short Term Memory | 2 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| French | 1 |
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Language Learning & Technology | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| China (Beijing) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkYing Wu; Xiaoxie Liu; Yuanyuan Zhao; Xinyan Chen; Jianwu Gao – Language Learning & Technology, 2025
While multimodal glossing is supported by theories like Mayer's Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, its effectiveness remains debated due to potential cognitive demands. This study examined how repeated exposures, working memory (WM), and gloss lookup behaviors influence vocabulary retention. Ninety-six Chinese high school students were…
Descriptors: High School Students, Foreign Countries, Second Language Learning, Vocabulary
Pengchong Zhang; Shi Zhang – Language Learning & Technology, 2025
Multimodal input can significantly support second language (L2) vocabulary learning and comprehension. However, very little research has examined how L2 learners, especially young learners, allocate attention when exposed to such input and whether learning from multimodal input can be explained by attention allocation. This study therefore…
Descriptors: Attention, Eye Movements, Vocabulary Development, Reading Comprehension
