Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Anatomy | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Computer Simulation | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Curriculum Design | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Medical Students | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 1 |
| Premedical Students | 1 |
| Retention (Psychology) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Kulesza, Randy J. | 1 |
| Labranche, Leah | 1 |
| Terrell, Mark | 1 |
| Wilson, Timothy D. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLabranche, Leah; Wilson, Timothy D.; Terrell, Mark; Kulesza, Randy J. – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2022
Three-dimensional (3D) digital anatomical models show potential to demonstrate complex anatomical relationships; however, the literature is inconsistent as to whether they are effective in improving the anatomy performance, particularly for students with low spatial visualization ability (Vz). This study investigated the educational effectiveness…
Descriptors: Spatial Ability, Computer Simulation, Anatomy, Visualization
