Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Memory | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Recognition (Psychology) | 2 |
| Stimuli | 2 |
| Auditory Discrimination | 1 |
| Auditory Stimuli | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Cognitive Psychology | 1 |
| Computational Linguistics | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Mulligan, Neil W. | 2 |
| Osborn, Katherine | 1 |
| Picklesimer, Milton | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mulligan, Neil W.; Picklesimer, Milton – Journal of Memory and Language, 2012
Dual-process models differentiate between two bases of memory, recollection and familiarity. It is routinely claimed that deeper, semantic encoding enhances recollection relative to shallow, non-semantic encoding, and that recollection is largely a product of semantic, elaborative rehearsal. The present experiments show that this is not always the…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Semantics, Computational Linguistics, Familiarity
Mulligan, Neil W.; Osborn, Katherine – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2009
The modality-match effect in recognition refers to superior memory for words presented in the same modality at study and test. Prior research on this effect is ambiguous and inconsistent. The present study demonstrates that the modality-match effect is found when modality is rendered salient at either encoding or retrieval. Specifically, in…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Recall (Psychology), Evaluation, Experiments

Peer reviewed
Direct link
