Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Language Processing | 2 |
| Memory | 2 |
| Semantics | 2 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Cognitive Development | 1 |
| Color | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computational Linguistics | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Familiarity | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Mulligan, Neil W. | 2 |
| Lozito, Jeffrey P. | 1 |
| Picklesimer, Milton | 1 |
| Rosner, Zachary A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMulligan, Neil W.; Picklesimer, Milton – Journal of Memory and Language, 2012
Dual-process models differentiate between two bases of memory, recollection and familiarity. It is routinely claimed that deeper, semantic encoding enhances recollection relative to shallow, non-semantic encoding, and that recollection is largely a product of semantic, elaborative rehearsal. The present experiments show that this is not always the…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Semantics, Computational Linguistics, Familiarity
Mulligan, Neil W.; Lozito, Jeffrey P.; Rosner, Zachary A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2006
Generation enhances memory for occurrence but may not enhance other aspects of memory. The present study further delineates the negative generation effect in context memory reported in N. W. Mulligan (2004). First, the negative generation effect occurred for perceptual attributes of the target item (its color and font) but not for extratarget…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Age Differences, Memory, Color
