Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Statistical Analysis | 7 |
Item Response Theory | 4 |
Nonparametric Statistics | 3 |
Responses | 3 |
Simulation | 3 |
Cheating | 2 |
Educational Assessment | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Test Items | 2 |
Adaptive Testing | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Meijer, Rob R. | 7 |
Emons, Wilco H. M. | 1 |
Fox, Jean-Paul | 1 |
Sijtsma, Klaas | 1 |
Sotaridona, Leonardo S. | 1 |
Tendeiro, Jorge N. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tendeiro, Jorge N.; Meijer, Rob R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2014
In recent guidelines for fair educational testing it is advised to check the validity of individual test scores through the use of person-fit statistics. For practitioners it is unclear on the basis of the existing literature which statistic to use. An overview of relatively simple existing nonparametric approaches to identify atypical response…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Test Validity, Scores, Statistical Analysis
Fox, Jean-Paul; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2008
The authors discuss a new method that combines the randomized response technique with item response theory. This method allows the researcher to obtain information at the individual person level without knowing the true responses. With this new method, it is possible to compare groups of individuals by means of analysis of variance or regression…
Descriptors: Psychological Evaluation, Educational Assessment, Item Response Theory, Statistical Analysis

Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1995
A statistic used by R. Meijer (1994) to determine person-fit referred to the number of errors from the deterministic Guttman model (L. Guttman, 1950), but this was, in fact, based on the number of errors from the deterministic Guttman model as defined by J. Loevinger (1947, 1948). (SLD)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Models, Responses, Scaling

Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1994
Through simulation, the power of the U3 statistic was compared with the power of one of the simplest person-fit statistics, the sum of the number of Guttman errors. In most cases, a weighted version of the latter statistic performed as well as the U3 statistic. (SLD)
Descriptors: Error Patterns, Item Response Theory, Nonparametric Statistics, Power (Statistics)
Sotaridona, Leonardo S.; Meijer, Rob R. – 2001
Two new indices to detect answer copying on a multiple-choice test, S(1) and S(2) (subscripts), are proposed. The S(1) index is similar to the K-index (P. Holland, 1996) and the K-overscore(2), (K2) index (L. Sotaridona and R. Meijer, in press), but the distribution of the number of matching incorrect answers of the source (examinee s) and the…
Descriptors: Cheating, Multiple Choice Tests, Responses, Sample Size
Emons, Wilco H. M.; Sijtsma, Klaas; Meijer, Rob R. – Psychological Methods, 2005
Person-fit statistics test whether the likelihood of a respondent's complete vector of item scores on a test is low given the hypothesized item response theory model. This binary information may be insufficient for diagnosing the cause of a misfitting item-score vector. The authors propose a comprehensive methodology for person-fit analysis in the…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Item Response Theory, Evaluation Research, Goodness of Fit
Meijer, Rob R. – 2001
Recent developments of person-fit analysis in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) are discussed. Methods from statistical process control are presented that have been proposed to classify an item score pattern as fitting or misfitting the underlying item response theory (IRT) model in a CAT. Most person-fit research in CAT is restricted to…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Certification, Computer Assisted Testing, High Stakes Tests