Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Sequential Learning | 3 |
| Incidental Learning | 2 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Age | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Diseases | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Meier, Beat | 3 |
| Weiermann, Brigitte | 2 |
| Cock, Josephine | 1 |
| Kaelin-Lang, Alain | 1 |
| Stephan, Marianne A. | 1 |
| Zaugg, Sabine Weber | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Weiermann, Brigitte; Cock, Josephine; Meier, Beat – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
Implicit task sequence learning may be attributed to learning the order of perceptual stimulus features associated with the task sequence, learning a series of automatic task set activations, or learning an integrated sequence that derives from 2 correlated streams of information. In the present study, our purpose was to distinguish among these 3…
Descriptors: Sequential Learning, Incidental Learning, Stimuli, Reaction Time
Stephan, Marianne A.; Meier, Beat; Zaugg, Sabine Weber; Kaelin-Lang, Alain – Brain and Cognition, 2011
It is still unclear, whether patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) are impaired in the incidental learning of different motor sequences in short succession, although such a deficit might greatly impact their daily life. The aim of this study was thus to clarify the relation between disease parameters of PD and incidental motor learning of two…
Descriptors: Diseases, Incidental Learning, Rating Scales, Patients
Weiermann, Brigitte; Meier, Beat – Cognition, 2012
The purpose of the present study was to investigate incidental sequence learning across the lifespan. We tested 50 children (aged 7-16), 50 young adults (aged 20-30), and 50 older adults (aged >65) with a sequence learning paradigm that involved both a task and a response sequence. After several blocks of practice, all age groups slowed down…
Descriptors: Evidence, Older Adults, Young Adults, Learning Processes

Peer reviewed
Direct link
