Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Correlation | 4 |
| Prior Learning | 4 |
| Readability Formulas | 4 |
| Reading Tests | 4 |
| Readability | 3 |
| Biology | 2 |
| Cues | 2 |
| Essays | 2 |
| High School Students | 2 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 2 |
| Individual Differences | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 4 |
| Allen, Laura K. | 2 |
| Snow, Erica L. | 2 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 2 |
| Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 2 |
| Nelson Denny Reading Tests | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
McNamara, Danielle S. – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2017
This study demonstrates the generalization of previous laboratory results showing the benefits of Self-Explanation Reading Training (SERT) to college students' course exam performance. The participants were 265 students enrolled in an Introductory Biology course, 59 of whom were provided with SERT. The results showed that SERT benefited students…
Descriptors: Reading Strategies, Reading Comprehension, Introductory Courses, Biology
McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2017
This study demonstrates the generalization of previous laboratory results showing the benefits of self-explanation reading training (SERT) to college students' course exam performance. The participants were 265 students enrolled in an Introductory Biology course, 59 of whom were provided with SERT training. The results showed that SERT benefited…
Descriptors: Biology, Correlation, Introductory Courses, Knowledge Level
Allen, Laura K.; Snow, Erica L.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2016
A commonly held belief among educators, researchers, and students is that high-quality texts are easier to read than low-quality texts, as they contain more engaging narrative and story-like elements. Interestingly, these assumptions have typically failed to be supported by the literature on writing. Previous research suggests that higher quality…
Descriptors: Role, Writing (Composition), Natural Language Processing, Hypothesis Testing
Allen, Laura K.; Snow, Erica L.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2016
A commonly held belief among educators, researchers, and students is that high-quality texts are easier to read than low-quality texts, as they contain more engaging narrative and story-like elements. Interestingly, these assumptions have typically failed to be supported by the literature on writing. Previous research suggests that higher quality…
Descriptors: Role, Writing (Composition), Natural Language Processing, Hypothesis Testing

Peer reviewed
Direct link
