Descriptor
| Achievement Gains | 2 |
| Compensatory Education | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Norm Referenced Tests | 2 |
| Program Evaluation | 2 |
| Research Design | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Evaluation and… | 1 |
Author
| Linn, Robert L. | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
The internal validity of the RMC models, especially Model A, is examined. Concern centers on limiting evaluation to cognitive outcomes, using constant percentile as the no-treatment expectation, and using norms for one test to establish the expected no-treatment performance level for another test. (MH)
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Compensatory Education, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
Linn, Robert L. – 1978
The three RMC models endorsed by the U.S. Office of Education for the evaluation of Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I programs are based on narrowly conceived approaches to evaluation--the measurement of cognitive achievement gains. Each model requires the comparison of observed student performance with an estimate of what level of…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Gains, Compensatory Education, Control Groups


