Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Abstract Reasoning | 1 |
| Courses | 1 |
| Design | 1 |
| Laboratories | 1 |
| Learning Activities | 1 |
| Logical Thinking | 1 |
| Organic Chemistry | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 1 |
| Scientific Concepts | 1 |
| Student Reaction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Field M. Watts | 1 |
| Ginger V. Shultz | 1 |
| Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Michigan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkField M. Watts; Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn; Ginger V. Shultz – Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2024
Research on student learning in organic chemistry indicates that students tend to focus on surface level features of molecules with less consideration of implicit properties when engaging in mechanistic reasoning. Writing-to-learn (WTL) is one approach for supporting students' mechanistic reasoning. A variation of WTL incorporates peer review and…
Descriptors: Organic Chemistry, Writing Assignments, Design, Peer Evaluation
