NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20250
Since 2022 (last 5 years)0
Since 2017 (last 10 years)0
Since 2007 (last 20 years)1
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gelman, Susan A.; Ebeling, Karen S. – Cognition, 1998
Two studies examined the hypothesis that children rely on name representations, often indexed by shape, in their semantic representations. Results suggest that, although shape plays an important role in children's early naming, other factors are also important, including the mental state of the picture's creator (whether intentional or not).…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Intention, Preschool Children, Semantics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gelman, Susan A.; Bloom, Paul – Cognition, 2007
Generic sentences (such as "Birds lay eggs") are important in that they refer to kinds (e.g., birds as a group) rather than individuals (e.g., the birds in the henhouse). The present set of studies examined aspects of how generic nouns are understood by English speakers. Adults and children (4- and 5-year-olds) were presented with scenarios about…
Descriptors: Semantics, Sentences, Nouns, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Diesendruck, Gil; Gelman, Susan A.; Lebowitz, Kim – Developmental Psychology, 1998
Four studies examined the influence of essentialist information such as internal properties and perceptual similarity on 3-, 4-, and 5-year olds' interpretations of labels. Results suggested that children have essentialist beliefs about animals, but not about artifacts, and that these beliefs interact with children's assumptions about word meaning…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Concept Formation, Language Acquisition, Performance Factors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gelman, Susan A.; Bloom, Paul – Cognition, 2000
Examined how 3- and 5-year-olds and adults extend names for human-made artifacts. Found that even 3-year-olds were more likely to provide artifact names (e.g., "knife") when they believed objects were intentionally created and to provide material-based descriptions (e.g., "plastic") when they believed objects were accidentally…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Comparative Analysis, Generalization