Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Teacher Evaluation | 2 |
| Value Added Models | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Educational Change | 1 |
| Educational Policy | 1 |
| Test Bias | 1 |
| Test Reliability | 1 |
| Test Validity | 1 |
| Validity | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| AERA Online Paper Repository | 2 |
Author
| Geiger, Tray | 2 |
| Amerein-Beardsley, Audrey | 1 |
| Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Texas (Houston) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkGeiger, Tray; Amerein-Beardsley, Audrey – AERA Online Paper Repository, 2017
The Education Value-Added Assessment System (EVAAS), the value-added model (VAM) sold by the business analytics software company SAS Institute Inc., is advertised as offering "precise, reliable and unbiased results that go far beyond what other simplistic [value-added] models found in the market today can provide." In this study, we…
Descriptors: Value Added Models, Test Validity, Test Reliability, Teacher Evaluation
Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey; Geiger, Tray – AERA Online Paper Repository, 2017
Contemporary teacher evaluation systems are built upon multiple measures including, primarily, teacher-level value-added and observational estimates. While researchers have conducted examinations of these systems and indicators, researchers have not investigated how using these systems might distort the validity of the inferences being drawn,…
Descriptors: Value Added Models, Computation, Teacher Evaluation, Accountability
