Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 2 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Credentials | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Data | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Educational Testing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Clauser, Brian E. | 2 |
| Margolis, Melissa J. | 2 |
| Baldwin, Su G. | 1 |
| Chis, Liliana | 1 |
| Dillon, Gerard F. | 1 |
| Harik, Polina | 1 |
| McManus, I. C. | 1 |
| Mee, Janet | 1 |
| Mollon, Jennifer | 1 |
| Williams, Simon | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Clauser, Brian E.; Harik, Polina; Margolis, Melissa J.; McManus, I. C.; Mollon, Jennifer; Chis, Liliana; Williams, Simon – Applied Measurement in Education, 2009
Numerous studies have compared the Angoff standard-setting procedure to other standard-setting methods, but relatively few studies have evaluated the procedure based on internal criteria. This study uses a generalizability theory framework to evaluate the stability of the estimated cut score. To provide a measure of internal consistency, this…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Group Discussion, Standard Setting (Scoring), Scoring
Clauser, Brian E.; Mee, Janet; Baldwin, Su G.; Margolis, Melissa J.; Dillon, Gerard F. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2009
Although the Angoff procedure is among the most widely used standard setting procedures for tests comprising multiple-choice items, research has shown that subject matter experts have considerable difficulty accurately making the required judgments in the absence of examinee performance data. Some authors have viewed the need to provide…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Program Effectiveness, Expertise, Health Personnel

Peer reviewed
Direct link
