Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Correlation | 2 |
| Judges | 2 |
| Licensing Examinations… | 2 |
| Reliability | 2 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Data | 1 |
| Differences | 1 |
| Medicine | 1 |
| Performance | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Clauser, Brian E. | 2 |
| Clauser, Jerome C. | 1 |
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 1 |
| Margolis, Melissa J. | 1 |
| Mee, Janet | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| United States Medical… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkClauser, Jerome C.; Clauser, Brian E.; Hambleton, Ronald K. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2014
The purpose of the present study was to extend past work with the Angoff method for setting standards by examining judgments at the judge level rather than the panel level. The focus was on investigating the relationship between observed Angoff standard setting judgments and empirical conditional probabilities. This relationship has been used as a…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Validity, Reliability, Correlation
Clauser, Brian E.; Mee, Janet; Margolis, Melissa J. – International Journal of Testing, 2013
This study investigated the extent to which the performance data format impacted data use in Angoff standard setting exercises. Judges from two standard settings (a total of five panels) were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The full-data group received two types of data: (1) the proportion of examinees selecting each option and (2) plots…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Validity, Reliability
