Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Grading | 2 |
| Intelligent Tutoring Systems | 2 |
| Natural Language Processing | 2 |
| Programming | 2 |
| Scripts | 2 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Courseware | 1 |
| Dialogs (Language) | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Interaction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 2 |
Author
| Cai, Zhiqiang | 2 |
| Hu, Xiangen | 2 |
| Gong, Yan | 1 |
| Graesser, Art | 1 |
| Graesser, Arthur C. | 1 |
| Qiu, Qizhi | 1 |
Publication Type
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkCai, Zhiqiang; Hu, Xiangen; Graesser, Arthur C. – Grantee Submission, 2019
Conversational Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) are expensive to develop. While simple online courseware could be easily authored by teachers, the authoring of conversational ITSs usually involves a team of experts with different expertise, including domain experts, linguists, instruction designers, programmers, artists, computer scientists,…
Descriptors: Programming, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Courseware, Educational Technology
Cai, Zhiqiang; Gong, Yan; Qiu, Qizhi; Hu, Xiangen; Graesser, Art – Grantee Submission, 2016
AutoTutor uses conversational intelligent agents in learning environments. One of the major challenges in developing AutoTutor applications is to assess students' natural language answers to AutoTutor questions. We investigated an AutoTutor dataset with 3358 student answers to 49 AutoTutor questions. In comparisons with human ratings, we found…
Descriptors: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Natural Language Processing, Dialogs (Language), Programming
