Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Children | 2 |
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| Intuition | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Animals | 1 |
| Cognitive Development | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Memory | 1 |
| Photography | 1 |
| Reprography | 1 |
| Thinking Skills | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognition | 2 |
Author
| Bloom, Paul | 2 |
| Freedman, Rebecca | 1 |
| Gjersoe, Nathalia L. | 1 |
| Gutheil, Grant | 1 |
| Hood, Bruce | 1 |
| Valderrama, Nohemy | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHood, Bruce; Gjersoe, Nathalia L.; Bloom, Paul – Cognition, 2012
Philosophers use hypothetical duplication scenarios to explore intuitions about personal identity. Here we examined 5- to 6-year-olds' intuitions about the physical properties and memories of a live hamster that is apparently duplicated by a machine. In Study 1, children thought that more of the original's physical properties than episodic…
Descriptors: Animals, Photography, Reprography, Identification
Gutheil, Grant; Bloom, Paul; Valderrama, Nohemy; Freedman, Rebecca – Cognition, 2004
It is commonly assumed that artifacts are named solely on the basis of properties they currently possess; in particular, their appearance and function. The experiments presented here explore the alternative proposal that the history of an artifact plays some role in how it is named. In three experiments, children between the ages of 4 and 9 years…
Descriptors: Intuition, Children, Adults, Cognitive Development
